Last week’s discussion about measuring social impact made
clear to me the magnitude of ways that you can measure social impact. With Face Race, we need to measure the bottom
line difference that this program or platform would have on customers
businesses. But I have been thinking
back to earlier this semester when I was pursuing my own venture, I still have
questions of how the measurement would have been an accurate “dipstick” of the
teacher training. I can see how the
other ventures in the class would be measured using a variety of techniques,
but how do you measure when there are a multitude of other interventions or
services at play? In the case of teacher training, the data could just vary
from year to year because of different students? Or other variables that can’t be controlled?
In my experience in education, this is a common problem with “statistical” data
about a given program, curriculum, policy or reform. The new item is not able to be truly isolated
to test. Technology interventions in
schools with e-learning is the best example I can think of that pointedly can
be measured. In reflection, that’s my question for this week. How do you truly measure social impact of a
public school when there are a variety of factors at work? I am not invested in
the teacher training concept as a feasible venture, but I know I will still
spend some of my career seeking solutions to bettering our schools and it would
be beneficial to seek an answer now.
On another note, I wish I would have read ahead as the
readings for this week would have been a good refresher for the financial exam
I had last week. : )
But the timing is also perfect, I spent this weekend talking
to close friends who are looking for ways to increase cash flow in their
business. Now, I will have more to
contribute at the continuation of our conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment